Journal article
Lindsay S. Ham, Jacquelyn D. Wiersma-Mosley, Noah R. Wolkowicz, K. Jozkowski, Ana J. Bridges, A. Melkonian
Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 2019
Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 2019
Semantic Scholar
DOI
PubMed
Cite
Cite
APA
Click to copy
Ham, L. S., Wiersma-Mosley, J. D., Wolkowicz, N. R., Jozkowski, K., Bridges, A. J., & Melkonian, A. (2019). Effect of Alcohol Intoxication on Bystander Intervention in a Vignette Depiction of Sexual Assault. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs.
Chicago/Turabian
Click to copy
Ham, Lindsay S., Jacquelyn D. Wiersma-Mosley, Noah R. Wolkowicz, K. Jozkowski, Ana J. Bridges, and A. Melkonian. “Effect of Alcohol Intoxication on Bystander Intervention in a Vignette Depiction of Sexual Assault.” Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs (2019).
MLA
Click to copy
Ham, Lindsay S., et al. “Effect of Alcohol Intoxication on Bystander Intervention in a Vignette Depiction of Sexual Assault.” Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 2019.
BibTeX Click to copy
@article{lindsay2019a,
title = {Effect of Alcohol Intoxication on Bystander Intervention in a Vignette Depiction of Sexual Assault.},
year = {2019},
journal = {Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs},
author = {Ham, Lindsay S. and Wiersma-Mosley, Jacquelyn D. and Wolkowicz, Noah R. and Jozkowski, K. and Bridges, Ana J. and Melkonian, A.}
}
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Alcohol-related sexual violence remains a public health problem. Despite the popularity of sexual assault bystander intervention programs, these may be limited in addressing bystander intoxication because the effects of intoxication on intervening in a sexual assault are unknown. Therefore, we tested the effects of alcohol intoxication on the five steps of bystander intervention in a sexual assault vignette.
METHOD Young adults (N = 128; 50% women) were randomly assigned to consume alcohol (target blood alcohol concentration = 0.08%; n = 64) or a nonalcoholic control beverage (n = 64) in a bar-laboratory. Next, participants were presented with a vignette describing events occurring in a convivial drinking context that ends with nonconsensual sexual behavior. Latané and Darley's bystander intervention model steps were assessed in a semistructured interview.
RESULTS Participants in the control condition recalled the story more accurately (Step 1: notice the event) and reported greater risk/need for intervention (Step 2), but they did not differ on the latter three steps of bystander intervention compared with alcohol-condition participants. Intoxication effects were similar for men and women. Furthermore, risk/need for intervention (Step 2) partially mediated the effect of alcohol condition on personal responsibility (Step 3) and relative benefits versus costs from intervening (Step 4).
CONCLUSIONS Prevention programs should consider the effects of alcohol on detecting a sexual assault and the need to intervene. If intoxicated bystanders do not detect a sexual assault, then bystanders will not reach the crucial steps (i.e., taking responsibility for intervening; willingness and ability to intervene) required to intervene successfully.