Gender and racial/ethnic disparities in rates of publishing and inclusion in scientific-review processes.

Journal article

Malachi Willis, Ana J. Bridges, K. Jozkowski
Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 2021

Semantic Scholar DOI

Cite

APA Click to copy
Willis, M., Bridges, A. J., & Jozkowski, K. (2021). Gender and racial/ethnic disparities in rates of publishing and inclusion in scientific-review processes. Translational Issues in Psychological Science.

Chicago/Turabian Click to copy
Willis, Malachi, Ana J. Bridges, and K. Jozkowski. “Gender and Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Rates of Publishing and Inclusion in Scientific-Review Processes.” Translational Issues in Psychological Science (2021).

MLA Click to copy
Willis, Malachi, et al. “Gender and Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Rates of Publishing and Inclusion in Scientific-Review Processes.” Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 2021.

BibTeX Click to copy

@article{malachi2021a,
  title = {Gender and racial/ethnic disparities in rates of publishing and inclusion in scientific-review processes.},
  year = {2021},
  journal = {Translational Issues in Psychological Science},
  author = {Willis, Malachi and Bridges, Ana J. and Jozkowski, K.}
}

Abstract

Sexism and racism in academia have contributed to women and people of color being underrepresented at increasing levels of the academic hierarchy. We investigated whether people with socially marginalized identities experience disparities regarding rates of publishing and inclusion in the scientific-review process. Using a sample of academics in psychology departments at research-focused universities in the United States (n = 885), we found gender disparities for PhD holders and racial/ethnic disparities for graduate students. Specifically, female PhD holders and graduate students of color reported fewer publications and were less likely to be included in the scientific-review process compared with male PhD holders and White graduate students, respectively. Differences in research activity by gender and race/ethnicity in a contemporary sample of psychologists reflected a “leaky pipeline” that persists in psychology departments.